<< Previous | Index | Next >>"COHABITATION BEFORE MARRIAGE" INTRODUCTION 1. A practice acceptable to many people today is that of cohabitation before marriage... a. Where a couple who intend to get married decide to live together first b. In a poll on religion and the family conducted for Religion & Ethics Newsweekly, 49% of Americans said that cohabitation was acceptable 2. Yet in the August 2005 issue of Psychology Today, there was an interesting article... a. "The Cohabitation Trap: When 'Just Living Together' Sabotages Love" by Nancy Wartik b. A blurb advertising the article: "Living together before marriage seems like a smart way to road test the relationship. But cohabitation may lead you to wed for all the wrong reasons--or turn into a one-way trip to splitsville." 3. The article first described the general reasoning behind cohabitation... a. That many see cohabitation as sort of future laboratory for marriage b. That living together will help them make informed decisions regarding marriage [Yet the research suggests something different. There is a very real danger in cohabitation before marriage. Before we consider that danger, let's first make clear what the Bible teaches about...] I. THE SIN OF COHABITATION A. MARRIAGE IS HONORABLE... 1. The Bible speaks of the honor of marriage - He 13:4 2. Of course, marriage was first instituted by God - cf. Mt 19:4-6 3. It symbolizes the relationship between Christ and His church - cf. Ep 5:22-33 4. It also serves as a deterrent to fornication (sexual immorality) - cf. 1Co 7:2,8-9 B. COHABITATION IS FORNICATION... 1. Fornication is sex outside of the marriage bond 2. The Greek word porneia includes "adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, intercourse with animals etc." - Thayer 3. Thus cohabitation falls under the condemnation described earlier - cf. He 13:4 4. It can keep one out of the kingdom of God - 1Co 6:9-10; Ga 5: 19-21 [For those who respect the authority of the Scriptures, cohabitation before marriage is rejected on moral grounds. But as illustrated in the above referenced article, there other reasons to reject it...] II. THE FOLLY OF COHABITATION A. COHABITATION UNDERMINES COMMITMENT... 1. Wartik's summary of the research: a. "Couples who move in together before marriage have up to two times the odds of divorce, as compared with couples who marry before living together." b. "Moreover, married couples who have lived together before exchanging vows tend to have poorer-quality marriages than couples who moved in after the wedding." 2. One theory why this happens - the inertia hypothesis a. Many cohabitating couples get married, but without an explicit decision to commit b. The marriage is seen simply as the next step in a relationship, not much different than the decision to live together 3. Men who cohabit are especially less likely to commit in a marriage relationship a. The hesitancy to commit led them to choose cohabitation in the first place b. The uncertainty about the relationship often continues after marriage c. Wartik referenced a 2004 study by psychologist Scott Stanley that found "that men who had lived with their spouse premaritally were on average less committed to their marriages than those who hadn't." B. COHABITATION WEAKENS THE MARITAL BOND... 1. The experience of cohabitation itself is detrimental to the marriage bond 2. "A couple of studies show that when couples cohabit, they tend to adopt less conventional beliefs about marriage and divorce, and it tends to make them less religious." - Paul Amato, professor at Penn State University 3. Those who cohabit do not have the same moral imperative to remain faithful after marriage a. If we are willing to sin with each other before we marry... b. How do we know we won't sin against each other after we marry? 4. A successful marriage is one built on trust; such trust is stronger among those who fear the Lord more than they fear their spouse! C. COHABITATION INJURIOUS TO CHILDREN... 1. To children whose parents remain in cohabitation a. "...cohabitation is not an ideal living arrangement for children." - Wartik b. "Emotionally or academically, the children of cohabiters just don't do as well, on average, as those with two married parents..." - ibid. 2. To children whose parents cohabitate and then marry a. If born out of wedlock, the stigma of illegitimacy looms b. Even if born after the marriage, the parents' example of cohabitation will likely encourage the children to follow in their steps CONCLUSION 1. Cohabitation is certainly no indication that one is serious about getting married... a. Many persons "...have different standards for living partners than for life partners." - Wartik b. "People are much fussier about whom they marry than whom they cohabitate with." - Amato 2. The Biblical concept of marriage is that life partners and living partners are to be the same... a. That people do not live together until they are willing to commit their lives to one another b. Such commitment strengthens the marriage bond and provides security for the children If you desire the best for yourself and your children, then follow the Biblical concept of marriage...!<< Previous | Index | Next >>
Home Page
Have A Bible Question? | Want A Free Bible Study Course? | Looking For A Church Near You?
Want To Talk With Someone By Phone? | Want To Discuss The Bible By Email?
Search The Outlines
Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2016
